Morrflate TenSix Pro Worth The Money!

TrailJustin · 2026-02-12T23:10:55+00:00

I have been experimenting with a lot of 3D printed parts recently seeing how they compare to the injection molded counter parts in the field and I do think this is where the future is going. Here are some of the pros and cons I see. Pro - Advance Manufacturing Techniques and Material Pro - Parts on Demand Locally Con - Entry Level Manufactures using wrong material or parts Pro - Easier to enter the space and be competitive Con - Early adopters now may be judging to harshly Lets break these down. Pro - Advance Manufacturing Techniques and Material I started noticing this with my Perry Parts 3D-printed bump stops. They’re able to design internal air channels and venting systems directly into the bump stop base to help tune compression and rebound performance. Trying to create air channels of this size using traditional injection molding would be extremely difficult. It would likely require multiple molds or complex tooling, which would make the process very expensive. Pro - Parts on Demand Locally I believe that in the future there will be local print shops with collections of industrial printers. Manufacturers will be able to send print files to a shop near you, and the part will be printed on demand. Once it’s finished, you could simply pick it up locally. This would reduce costs associated with large-scale manufacturing, shipping, and storage. Con - Entry Level Manufactures using wrong material or parts I’ve seen this come up a lot on Facebook pages and forums where someone’s 3D-printed part they bought off eBay or Etsy starts to warp or fail. Most of the time, this happens because the part was printed using the wrong material for the heat or environment it’s exposed to. That’s why it’s important to research your manufacturer. Companies like Perry Parts have recently invested heavily in more enterprise-grade printers that can print high-temperature, high-strength polymers designed to survive these kinds of conditions. Not all 3D printing is the same. The material choice and printer capability matter just as much as the design itself. Pro - Easier to enter the space and be competitive There’s no doubt that competition between manufacturers is a good thing. It pushes companies to be better than one another and to come up with the next great idea. As consumers, we benefit from that competition by getting better, more affordable products. A perfect example is the smartphone. In the early years, manufacturers were constantly competing to offer the next best feature to get you to switch to their brand. That competition is what drove rapid innovation. Now, take that same concept and apply it to 3D printing. This technology allows smaller manufacturers to break into spaces that were traditionally dominated by big companies with deep pockets. Smaller shops can design and produce products in-house with just a printer and a computer, and sometimes create something even better than what’s currently on the market. That forces the larger companies to either innovate or adjust their pricing to stay competitive. Con - Early adopters now may be judging to harshly I see this time and time again, but the consumer base these days is honestly just entitled. People want their products to be cheap, fast, and perfect. That’s simply not how the world works. Then they jump on social media and call out a company that’s just trying to enter the space and compete with brands that have millions of dollars behind them. In this ever-changing market, a lot of people adopting 3D-printed parts don’t fully understand the technology or the manufacturing process, and they end up being overly critical of the product. I’ve even heard someone say, “I don’t like the lines on the product.” Well… design your own printer that doesn’t produce layer lines. If the product performs and the only thing you don’t like is the surface lines, your life might be going pretty well if that’s the biggest issue you have to complain about.

TrailJustin

Member

Jan 3, 2026

The first snowfall just hit California, and snow wheeling season is officially in full swing. I finally got a chance to test out my Morrflate four tire inflator system along with their TenSix Pro, and I was able to air up faster than my friend running an ARB Twin.

Don’t get me wrong, the ARB Twin is a solid compressor, but the TenSix Pro is massive and puts out around 10 CFM, which is more than the ARB. For comparison, my friend with the ARB Twin also has a homemade four tire inflator setup, but it just couldn’t keep up.

I was able to air up my 35s and my father-in-law’s 35s in the same amount of time it took him to air up his 37s. Here’s what I found that really helped with that success:

The TenSix Pro outputs more CFM than the ARB Twin.
The Morrflate air chucks are designed with deeper engagement on the Schrader valve, which increases airflow.
The Morrflate four tire system uses high-flow fittings, which you can visibly see compared to standard fittings.

Now the only thing I need to figure out is how to mount this setup so it’s easy to use and doesn’t get in the way.